George Orwell (author of the famous Animal Farm) wrote an essay titled Why I Write in the summer of 1946. He outlined for reasons, which I think can be used for anyone. I quote him verbatim,
"(i) Sheer egoism. Desire to seem clever, to be talked about, to be remembered after death, to get your own back on the grown-ups who snubbed you in childhood, etc., etc. It is humbug to pretend this is not a motive, and a strong one. Writers share this characteristic with scientists, artists, politicians, lawyers, soldiers, successful businessmen — in short, with the whole top crust of humanity. The great mass of human beings are not acutely selfish. After the age of about thirty they almost abandon the sense of being individuals at all — and live chiefly for others, or are simply smothered under drudgery. But there is also the minority of gifted, willful people who are determined to live their own lives to the end, and writers belong in this class. Serious writers, I should say, are on the whole more vain and self-centered than journalists, though less interested in money.
(ii) Aesthetic enthusiasm. Perception of beauty in the external world, or, on the other hand, in words and their right arrangement. Pleasure in the impact of one sound on another, in the firmness of good prose or the rhythm of a good story. Desire to share an experience which one feels is valuable and ought not to be missed. The aesthetic motive is very feeble in a lot of writers, but even a pamphleteer or writer of textbooks will have pet words and phrases which appeal to him for non-utilitarian reasons; or he may feel strongly about typography, width of margins, etc. Above the level of a railway guide, no book is quite free from aesthetic considerations.
(iii) Historical impulse. Desire to see things as they are, to find out true facts and store them up for the use of posterity.
(iv) Political purpose. — Using the word ‘political’ in the widest possible sense. Desire to push the world in a certain direction, to alter other peoples’ idea of the kind of society that they should strive after. Once again, no book is genuinely free from political bias. The opinion that art should have nothing to do with politics is itself a political attitude."
Now, It does not take much to see that those same reasons could be used to explain, at least in part, as to why people blog. I am sure now that many people would use blogs also as a tool for communication and as some sort of online diary. I guess a blog allows for that too. But I feel the reasons (i) and (iv) could be used to most accurately explain the thousands of blogs by people daily. And a blog is so much easier than a book, you do not have to write particulary well and there is no publisher you need to search for.
I'll have all sort of ramblings here, much in part due to my equal interests in naked singluarities and polar bears. I think, however that, most posts would involve scotch whisky, blues and my athestic philosophy. I welcome all who share intrests in those 3 topics. So till the next time.
Saturday, February 10, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Hey Arun,
Keep blogging!!! haha
Post a Comment